Smart rightsizing – 6 steps to increase efficiency and effectiveness

ndetails

Elon Musk’s dramatic Reduction in Force at Twitter (affectionately known as “RIF” in the US) is both an early indication of more to come, and a good example of how NOT to do it. He has put the brand and company at risk by neglecting the reality that talented employees are the motor of value creation by collaboratively driving continuous innovation and adaptation in competitive markets.

Despite efforts to invest in resilient sectors over the last few years, private equity is now facing a new challenge that investors have not experienced since the Global Financial Crisis over ten years ago – how to reduce cost without impairing value, and without government support?

Rightsizing is never fun. However, done properly, it can be a liberating moment for organisations, that unlocks new potential – increasing both efficiency and effectiveness. There are six steps to success:

1. Understand the cost point needed to achieve financial objectives up front. Top-down cost reduction targets need to be clear from the beginning. And, they should err on the conservative side to avoid a demotivating “death by a thousand cuts”.

2. Senior management needs to assume the risk of downsizing for managers. There are always risks involved with workforce reductions. Middle managers will come with reasons why a reduction will result in chaos. Senior executives, often the CFO, need to be comfortable taking the calculated risk themselves in order to see a RIF through.

3. Understand time spent and productivity drivers in order to make clear choices of where and how headcount reductions are justified. It’s better to be selective and strategic about cost reductions that set the company-up for future success, rather than default to a “haircut” approach. A deep activity survey, like Humatica’s modas, delivers the necessary fact-base for good cost-out decisions.

4. Look for opportunities to reduce layers and teams rather than piecemeal reductions. In particular, increasing spans-of-control by resolving structural inefficiencies in the organisation and delayering also improves effectiveness, communications and decision-making in the organisation. And, it releases the potential of ambitious high-performers.

5. Utilise a fact-based view of individual performance for selection. Reliable information is often lacking because of poor talent management and feedback processes. Humatica’s calibrated review approach delivers accurate information on individual performance to enable best decisions.

6. Communicate the vision beyond the rightsizing and put cost reduction in this context. There needs to be a better future beyond the immediate pain of a rightsizing effort. And, it’s leadership’s job to explain this.

Done properly, rightsizing can be a liberating inflection point for a firm. Done poorly, it can spell the beginning of the end of the company. Elon Musk’s unorthodox example with Twitter will surely provide interesting lessons learnt in the coming weeks and months.

Related Insights

Mastering the new science of engineered management decision processes
28 Oct, 2024 By Humatica

Mastering the new science of engineered management decision processes

Despite huge efforts to improve operational processes over the past 20 years, critically important management processes are left up to the discretion of each manager…

Read more arrowicon
Thriving in the Storm: How Agile Organizations Outperform in Uncertain Markets
18 Sep, 2024 By Humatica

Thriving in the Storm: How Agile Organizations Outperform in Uncertain Markets

The global economy in 2024 resembles a rollercoaster more than ever before. Geopolitical tensions, technological disruptions, and shifting consumer behaviours have created a perfect storm…

Read more arrowicon
Decoding Organization and Leadership: Why the Founder vs Manager debate misses the point
10 Sep, 2024 By Humatica

Decoding Organization and Leadership: Why the Founder vs Manager debate misses the point

In the bustling world of Silicon Valley and beyond, a new paradigm is stirring up debate: “Founder Mode” vs “Manager Mode”. Paul Graham, co-founder of…

Read more arrowicon