Applying TQM to management processes and behaviour to ensure stable returns

ndetails

Edwards Deming, the father of modern-day statistical process control and Total Quality Management, understood that reducing sources of variability in business produces consistent results with greater efficiency. Quality issues increase output variance and exceptions that incur a disproportionate cost to resolve. Deming was an engineer, mathematician and physicist. He understood system analysis and optimisation. His TQM has been successfully applied by Toyota and countless other top manufacturers to identify and reduce sources of variability and waste in production. Investment managers face a similar challenge. They need to reduce variability as a means to increase average returns.

Deming’s TQM is the right approach for private equity also.  It starts with identifying sources of variability in investment performance. And there are many. Demand can vary. New competition can take share. And technology may disrupt. But these are longer-term external factors that can be assessed and mitigated through fact-based due diligence. Funds are steadily industrialising their investment processes to reduce these sources of variability.

The bigger problem facing buyouts today is internal variability with organisational effectiveness. Variance with management as a key enabler is particularly important right now, as companies face unprecedented external risks including supply bottlenecks, geopolitical disruption, commodity price and currency fluctuations, and a likely recession. This is the moment when Deming’s TQM should be applied to organisations in order to reduce variability and ensure stable returns despite increased market turbulence.

Funds have tried to reduce organisational variability with management assessments. But these don’t deliver pragmatic insights about the way an organisation is working below the senior team. Culture surveys don’t work either because they measure a broad set of factors, many of which don’t link with implementing the value creation plan.

What’s needed is an objective measure of organisational behaviours that drive the ability to make and implement decisions at all levels and in each function – the foundation for collective adaptation and agility. This understanding of organisational “system response” is the missing link between Deming’s fact-based TQM and PE value creation. Humatica’s Altus tool and behavioural benchmarks provide the necessary statistical process control for measuring the quality of interactions that drive the collective ability to adapt and implement the value creation plan. By comparing behaviours in a team with the statistical distribution from thousands of other teams, behavioural bottlenecks that impair the ability to implement the value creation plan are identified and can be resolved.

Deming understood the power of statistical process control and feedback to improve business performance. It’s time to apply his proven methods to organisational systems. Humatica’s behavioural benchmarking is delivering the hard facts to leverage TQM methods across private equity portfolios for reducing variability and increasing returns.

This article was originally published as the Humatica Corner in Real Deals magazine.

Related Insights

Mastering the new science of engineered management decision processes
28 Okt, 2024 By Humatica

Mastering the new science of engineered management decision processes

Despite huge efforts to improve operational processes over the past 20 years, critically important management processes are left up to the discretion of each manager…

Read more arrowicon
Thriving in the Storm: How Agile Organizations Outperform in Uncertain Markets
18 Sep, 2024 By Humatica

Thriving in the Storm: How Agile Organizations Outperform in Uncertain Markets

The global economy in 2024 resembles a rollercoaster more than ever before. Geopolitical tensions, technological disruptions, and shifting consumer behaviours have created a perfect storm…

Read more arrowicon
Decoding Organization and Leadership: Why the Founder vs Manager debate misses the point
10 Sep, 2024 By Humatica

Decoding Organization and Leadership: Why the Founder vs Manager debate misses the point

In the bustling world of Silicon Valley and beyond, a new paradigm is stirring up debate: “Founder Mode” vs “Manager Mode”. Paul Graham, co-founder of…

Read more arrowicon

Abonnieren Sie unseren monatlichen Newsletter und andere News Updates

Erhalten Sie jeden Monat Neuigkeiten und wertvolle Perspektiven zu Themen der organisatorischen Effektivität