Operating model redesign – Liberate or Incapacitate, the choice is yours

Operating model redesign – Liberate or Incapacitate, the choice is yours

Companies are reorganising more frequently than ever before. It’s a natural consequence of a more dynamic market environment. But how can they manage the risks associated with changing structures and reorganising positions?

Most senior executives underestimate the disruption that a reorganisation can cause in their knowledge-based, white collar organisations. What may seem to be a simple change at the top of an organisation – a realignment of responsibility, or adding a new role – has huge consequences for processes and interfaces at lower levels, in particular for the middle management.

Management processes are the fabric of collaboration. They are institutional knowledge and rarely documented – it’s in the DNA – just the way things get done. With a proper appreciation for critical soft-factor processes, adequate time and resources can be allocated to a reorganisation process and figuring out the implications of a top-level change at lower levels before “go-live”.

Successful reorganisations require many difficult choices along two dimensions simultaneously. Decisions need to be cascaded hierarchically starting with the high level structure and working through the implications for sub-structures, then process/interfaces, roles, people and finally performance metrics for each level in affected units. The complexity of inter-related topics to cover sequentially by level and topic area, makes a successful reorganisation difficult to master. On top of this, speed is critical for minimising the risk of debilitating uncertainty in the organisation.

The best way to master the challenges is to execute the reorganisation in a well-structured set of working sessions that enable key decision makers to agree the right choices, at the right time and in the right sequence. The objective is not just speed, but to ensure that managers at all levels understand the practical implications of the new structure in their area and can work productively from day-one. By working out the important details on how the new operating model should work ahead of go-live with To-Be managers in the new set-up, the period of uncertainty and unclarity for employees can be reduced to zero. Go-live is a quiet “non-event”, rather than a confusing “big-bang”.

Done right, a reorganisation can be a liberating inflection point, releasing the potential of hungry rising stars in the organisation to grow value. Done poorly, it can be the starting gun for an exodus of top talent and decline. The choice is yours.

This article was originally published as the Humatica Corner in Real Deals magazine.

Related Insights

AI and Competitive Advantage: Why the Moat Is the Data, Not the Model
23 Sep, 2026 By Bryan Turner

AI and Competitive Advantage: Why the Moat Is the Data, Not the Model

Every board strategy conversation about AI now includes a version of the same question: how do we use AI to get ahead, rather than just…

Read more
AI Risk: The 10 Things Every Board Should Know (and Most Don’t)
01 Sep, 2026 By Bryan Turner

AI Risk: The 10 Things Every Board Should Know (and Most Don’t)

Corporate governance has always lagged behind the risks it is meant to manage. Boards develop oversight frameworks for risks after those risks have become embedded…

Read more
The CFO’s AI Imperative: From Efficiency Gain to Strategic Transformation
11 Aug, 2026 By Bryan Turner

The CFO’s AI Imperative: From Efficiency Gain to Strategic Transformation

Finance has always been an early adopter of technology — from double-entry bookkeeping to spreadsheets to ERP to cloud-based analytics. And finance has always been…

Read more